Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Effect of two types of anesthesia on postoperative recovery of patients with gastric cancer and changes in the levels of their T lymphocyte subsets

Li Xin1, Yang Dan2, Chen Yan1, Shen Jiang1, Hong Tao1

1Department of Anesthesiology, Changzhou First People's Hospital; 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Changzhou Fourth People's Hospital, Changzhou, China.

For correspondence:-  Hong Tao   Email: ft1310@163.com

Accepted: 17 January 2019        Published: 28 February 2019

Citation: Xin L, Dan Y, Yan C, Jiang S, Tao H. Effect of two types of anesthesia on postoperative recovery of patients with gastric cancer and changes in the levels of their T lymphocyte subsets. Trop J Pharm Res 2019; 18(2):429-433 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v18i2.30

© 2019 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effects of two types of anesthesia on postoperative recovery of patients with gastric cancer (GC), and to assess changes in the levels of their T lymphocyte subsets.
Methods: Patients with GC (200 cases) were randomly assigned to two groups of 100 patients each: general anesthesia (GA) group and GA + epidural anesthesia (GAEP) group. Fasting venous blood samples (2 mL) were collected from the patients before anesthesia, and at different time-points: zero time (T0), 1 h (T1), day 1 (T2), and day 3 (T3) after surgery. CD3+, CD4+, CD8+T, and regulatory T cells (Tregs) were determined using a flow cytometer.
Results: Percent CD3+, CD4+, CD8+T, and ratio of CD4+ to CD8+ in both groups at 1 h and day 1 after operation were significantly lower than their values before anesthesia (p < 0.05). There were significant differences in CD3+ and CD4+ levels between the two groups on day 3 (p < 0.05). Percent peripheral CD4+ CD25+T, and ratio of CD4+ CD25+ to CD4+ in both groups also significantly increased at 1 h and day 1 after operation, while percent peripheral CD4+, CD25+T and CD4+ CD25+ to CD4+ ratio in GAEP group on day 1 after operation were significantly lower than those of GA group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: These results suggest that combination of general and epidural anesthesia partly controls the expressions of Tregs, thereby enhancing postoperative recovery of GC patients.

Keywords: Gastric cancer, T-lymphocyte subsets, Regulatory T-lymphocytes, Epidural, Anesthesia

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates